post_page_cover

‘The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial’ Review — Friedkin’s Final Film

Oct 2, 2023


It’s not often that we so definitively know an artist’s last project will, in fact, be their last. The world isn’t as clean and tidy as that, and oftentimes, it’s tragic to find that a piece of art is the last bastion of a truly great mind. So examining William Friedkin’s final film, The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial, feels like no easy task after his passing in August of this year — one as gargantuan as determining whether or not someone committed a mutiny, it seems.

The setup for the legendary French Connection director’s final film is simple: a legal drama that follows the trial of naval officer Stephen Maryk (Jake Lacy), who’s been court-martialed after relieving his commanding officer, Commander Queeg (Kiefer Sutherland), of duty during a time of crisis on their ship. The trial exists to determine whether Maryk’s actions were justified or, indeed, mutinous, and he is put against both prosecutor Commander Challee (Monica Raymund) and the military court as a whole, helmed by the late Lance Reddick as Captain Luther Blakely. His only defense is Lieutenant Barney Greenwald (Jason Clarke), a naval aviator and lawyer who’s reluctant to even have to defend his fellow officer against such a heavy charge.

To be fully transparent, I always thought of Friedkin as “the Exorcist guy” before his passing in August — and really, I’m still hesitant to touch that movie with a ten-foot pole. Caine Mutiny is my first and only exposure to his work as a director (and as a screenwriter, given he also wrote the teleplay), and as such, I can’t say whether, as his final film, it was a worthy endcap to a sixty-year legacy. I’m of the mind that no one piece can possibly be representative of an artist’s entire legacy, and ultimately, maybe that’s for the better since this film finds itself in a slow and underwhelming place.

The Conundrum of the Locked-Room Story
Image via Showtime 

I love a locked-room story — it’s why I adored Ted Geoghegan’s Brooklyn 45 so much — and Caine Mutiny might be the pinnacle of them. Though it leaves the room where Lt Maryk is being tried a handful of times, the audience is stuck there for the majority of the hour and forty-five-minute film, enduring every moment of a trial they never find out the outcome of. As a result, the film’s roots as a stage play are more than obvious, but to Friedkin’s credit, he let it exist as such, choosing not to force his hand into the staging in an attempt to make it more than what it is.

It’s exactly what you would expect from a Sunday night Showtime drama. In my head, it felt like one from the mid-aughts when I was a kid when Nickelodeon shut off for the night and it turned into Grown-Up Time. No frills, no sudden flashbacks to keep the audience on their toes, just simple interrogation, question after question, monologue after monologue. Friedkin lets his actors breathe, still, unmoving cameras capturing every minutiae of a performance — a necessary factor, in a story governed (at least partially) by law and order.

Some audiences might begin to flag around the halfway point of the film. There’s nothing about Friedkin’s teleplay or his direction to entice audiences other than the mountains of dialogue being delivered at every available moment, with barely a pause for breath for anyone except Lacy’s Maryk, who sits largely silent and invisible despite being the reason for the film’s entire existence. Heavy amounts of information — oftentimes contradictory and complex — are thrown at audiences with exacting precision, and even as a self-professed fan of films that are mostly (or in this one’s case, all) dialogue, I found myself wanting for the kind of intermission built into the stage version of this story.

RELATED: No One Hated ‘The Exorcist II’ More Than William Friedkin

‘The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial’ Is Saved by Its Captivating Performances
Image via Showtime 

The actors, at least, do their damndest to keep your eyes on them, even as they sit unmoving in their chairs. It’s a round-robin of both recognizable faces and complete strangers as the trial goes on, each giving a more elaborate performance than the last. Tom Riley and Francois Battiste stand out in particular, with Jay Duplass and Lewis Pullman bringing up the rear — the latter in a surprisingly subdued performance compared to his other recent work. Each is the piece in a larger puzzle, and there’s very little in the way of character work here; it’s like watching a succession of monologues in an acting class, each actor proving they can hold their own in a scene. Some are more successful than others, and it’s Raymund and Clarke who hold everything together with their questioning, like watching the finals at the US Open.

Maryk and Queeg, naturally, are the faces that break up the proceedings, their lengthy monologues showcasing two men deeply at odds, one just as emotional and high-strung as the other. Sutherland does, undoubtedly, give an impressive performance as a clearly tense and potentially unwell captain being put through the wringer by Greenwald. He appears for only about twenty minutes of the film — despite its trailer focusing entirely on his testimony — and it reminds me that, like his appearance in fellow October favorite The Lost Boys, he continues to reign supreme at playing the most interesting character in the room who also happens to have the least amount of screentime.

It’s Clarke’s Greenwald, though, that sweeps the floor with everyone else – his second outing as an interrogator, after this year’s box office juggernaut Oppenheimer. He and Raymund are the beating heart of the film (alongside Reddick, given painfully little to do), and it’s him you focus the most on, even over Maryk. You wonder why someone so reluctant to even be in court has taken up such a specially difficult task, and as he warms to it, it’s clear that it’s Clarke, not Sutherland, giving the star performance here.

The Film Falters Under Outdated Ideals of Patriotism
Image via Showtime 

It’s a shame that such a solid set of performances are brought down by an underlying thread of jingoism, one that’s hard to put too fine a point on until the film’s final scene. The final shot of the film is a punch to the throat, a distinct flourish on Friedkin’s part that I absolutely adored, but its origins leave me feeling more than slightly queasy. It’s a sudden “sympathy for the devil” moment, very nearly eliminating the ambiguity the rest of the film strives for — definitively answering its own question of “who’s in the right here.” The film becomes largely sympathetic to Queeg in its final moments, and it becomes obvious as the credits roll that there has been no reexamination of the play’s context by Friedkin for 2023, that the exceedingly faithful patriotism to the Navy remains exactly the same as it was in 1954, the last time Caine Mutiny was adapted for the big screen. More so, even, with Friedkin factoring 9/11 into things.

It makes Greenwald, who was interesting to watch but in no way felt like the emotional core of the story, into the hero of the hour — or at least, it tries to, with only a mild degree of success, given that things turn around so quickly that I feel dizzy looking at anyone but Pullman, whose face remains a stoic mask of cynicism through his approximately eight minutes of screentime. I have a hard time reconciling that much faith in the military-industrial complex with not only the world we live in now, but simply the events of the rest of the film. It manages to twist my largely neutral (and leaning positive) feelings about said other ninety minutes into something slightly more sour — my good opinion, once lost, is most likely lost forever, to bastardize Jane Austen.

As a result, the film as a whole sits oddly in my mind as I try to stomach it, and not by the fault of any of the actors. Rather, it begs the question of why we needed this new version in the first place — why Friedkin was so adamant to make it, and what we’re getting from the ultimate sympathy with Queeg and the system that created him.

Rating: C+

The Big Picture

The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial, William Friedkin’s final film, feels slow and underwhelming, lacking the excitement and narrative depth one may expect. The film relies heavily on dialogue, with minimal action or visual stimulation, making it feel akin to a Sunday night Showtime drama from the mid-aughts. Despite solid performances by the actors, the film is weighed down by outdated ideals of patriotism.

The Caine Mutiny Court Martial premieres on Paramount+ on October 6.

Disclaimer: This story is auto-aggregated by a computer program and has not been created or edited by filmibee.
Publisher: Source link

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Channing Tatum Not Happy About Jenna Dewan Legal Battle

Channing Tatum Not Happy About Jenna Dewan Legal Battle Back in 2019, Channing and Jenna were declared legally single after separating the previous year. They were married for a decade and share one child, Everly, who was born in 2013.…

May 3, 2024

How RHONJ’s Melissa Feels About Keeping Distance From Teresa

Though the new season hasn't even debuted, Melissa indicated she's already excited about the reunion. "There's so much that needs to come out, and that's the place to do it," she said. "I mean, there's so many rumors and things…

May 3, 2024

15 Nightmare Audition Experiences Actors Shared

She said that, at a film festival several years down the road, a drunk producer told her, "Oh, Thandie, I've seen you recently!" She said, "And he lurched away, looking really shocked that he'd said that."Her husband, Ol Parker, spoke to…

May 2, 2024

Richard Simmons Defends Melissa McCarthy After Ozempic Comments

Ozempic is no laughing matter for the comedian. Handler revealed her "anti-aging doctor" prescribed her the medication without realizing what the drug was. "I didn't even know I was on it," she said during the Jan. 25, 2023 episode of Call…

May 2, 2024