Coming of Age in Stilettos
May 13, 2025
In her directorial debut Summer of 69, Jillian Bell aims to create a raunchy yet heartfelt comedy about growing up, sexual identity, and female friendship—but in trying to juggle all of its themes, tones, and character arcs, the film often loses its balance. A mix of mismatched comic sensibilities and surprisingly sincere moments, the film is elevated at times by its leads, especially Chloe Fineman and Sam Morelos, but ultimately suffers from tonal inconsistency and underbaked writing. Despite flashes of inspiration, it ends up feeling more like a sketch comedy idea stretched to feature length than a fully cohesive story.
The Setup:
Set in suburban California, the film follows socially awkward high schooler Abby Flores (Sam Morelos) who is determined to finally make a move on her longtime crush Max (Matt Cornett) after hearing he’s newly single and allegedly obsessed with the 69 position. What unfolds is a coming-of-age comedy that leans heavily on sexual humor and absurd hijinks but tries to root itself in a sincere female friendship—between Abby and a stripper named Santa Monica (Chloe Fineman)—that becomes the emotional center of the film.
Jillian Bell, known for her comedic roles in Workaholics and Brittany Runs a Marathon just to name a few, brings a certain offbeat charm to the film’s direction, allowing for zany situations and exaggerated performances. But what works in sketch or short-form content doesn’t always translate seamlessly to feature-length storytelling, and Bell seems unsure at times whether she’s directing a teen sex farce, a heartwarming mentor-mentee story, or a satirical critique of adult hypocrisy. The film tries to be all of those at once, and while that ambition is admirable, the execution often falters.
A Friendship at the Center:
The core relationship between Abby and Santa Monica is the film’s saving grace. Morelos is engaging and awkward in all the right ways, capturing the painful earnestness of adolescence with an unforced sincerity. Fineman, best known for her work on Saturday Night Live, plays against type here, grounding the flamboyant stripper character with vulnerability and warmth. Their chemistry is believable and frequently touching, even as they navigate through a plot that’s increasingly chaotic and implausible.
Unfortunately, the rest of the film doesn’t always support them. Much of the humor feels broad and occasionally forced, especially in scenes involving the cartoonishly villainous Rick Richards (played with gusto by Charlie Day, whose over-the-top performance feels imported from another movie entirely). Likewise, moments meant to be tender—such as Santa Monica’s insecurities about her past or Abby’s confusion about her own sexuality—are often undercut by abrupt tonal shifts, crude gags, or rushed resolutions.
There are glimpses of sharp satire, particularly in the way the film critiques the sexual double standards faced by teenage girls and the judgment women encounter for embracing their bodies and sexuality. The strip club, Diamond Dolls, is portrayed not as a den of sleaze but as a surrogate family for its workers, which gives the story a feminist edge that feels refreshing. However, this perspective is never fully developed beyond a surface-level acknowledgment, and the screenplay—by Bell, Liz Nico, and Jules Byrne—often leans on clichés instead of carving out a more distinct or bold narrative path.
Structural Misfires:
Supporting performances are a mixed bag. Natalie Morales adds a grounded, likable presence as Santa Monica’s old classmate Robin, but her role feels underutilized. Matt Cornett plays Max with a decent mix of sensitivity and teen awkwardness, though his character is more plot device than fully realized individual. Abby’s parents, who are largely absent from the story, are written so vaguely that when they return in the final scene, their reaction barely registers. The emotional payoff the film is aiming for lands with a soft thud rather than a punch.
One of the film’s more frustrating aspects is how it uses streaming and social media as plot elements without ever meaningfully engaging with them. Abby’s status as a successful gaming streamer is central to the story’s financial stakes, yet we never see how her persona functions online or how that relates to her struggle with confidence offline. Likewise, the film teases themes of internet fame, voyeurism, and performance, but only in the shallowest terms, missing a rich opportunity for commentary.
Raunchy but Safe:
Summer of 69 isn’t a complete misfire. It has moments of genuine sweetness and scattered laughs, and its core message—about embracing one’s awkwardness, accepting who you are, and finding your tribe—is worthwhile. Bell shows flashes of promise behind the camera, especially in the film’s quieter, character-driven scenes. But the movie is too tonally uneven, too reliant on tired tropes, and too unwilling to fully commit to either its raunch or its heart to truly succeed.
For a film with such a bold title and premise, Summer of 69 feels surprisingly safe and familiar. It gestures toward edginess but rarely delivers on it in a way that feels earned, and aims for empowerment but doesn’t always trust its characters enough to carry that message through. It wants to be a female-driven Superbad with a splash of Magic Mike, but ends up more like a confused mashup of teen rom-com and adult-themed sketch comedy.
Overall:
In the end, Summer of 69 is a passable but frustratingly uneven effort—a film that has potential but doesn’t quite know how to capitalize on it. Its strong lead performances and flashes of emotional depth are undermined by a scattershot script and muddled tone. With a tighter screenplay and a clearer sense of identity, Jillian Bell’s debut could have left a stronger mark. As it stands, it’s an awkward, sometimes charming, but ultimately forgettable summer fling of a movie.
Summer of 69 Review: Coming of Age in Stilettos
Acting – 6/10
Cinematography/Visual Effects – 5/10
Plot/Screenplay – 5.5/10
Setting/Theme – 6/10
Watchability – 5/10
Rewatchability – 4/10
User Review
0
(0 votes)
Summary
In the end, Summer of 69 is a passable but frustratingly uneven effort—a film that has potential but doesn’t quite know how to capitalize on it. Its strong lead performances and flashes of emotional depth are undermined by a scattershot script and muddled tone. With a tighter screenplay and a clearer sense of identity, Jillian Bell’s debut could have left a stronger mark. As it stands, it’s an awkward, sometimes charming, but ultimately forgettable summer fling of a movie.
Pros
Decent performances by the leads
A unique female-centered premise
Some moments of emotional depth
Cons
It’s tonally inconsistent
Lots of the themes feel underdeveloped
A lot of the comedy just doesn’t land
.review-total-box {
display: block;
}
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .user-review-area .review-percentage,
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .user-review-area .review-point {
width: 20%;
float: right;
margin-top: 5px;
}
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper.wp-review-circle-type .review-total-wrapper .review-circle.review-total {
margin: auto 0;
padding-top: 15px;
width: auto;
height: 100%;
clear: both;
}
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper.wp-review-circle-type .review-total-wrapper > .review-total-box {
display: block;
}
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper.wp-review-circle-type .review-total-wrapper > .review-total-box > div { display: none; }
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .review-total-wrapper .review-total-box h5 {
color: inherit;
}
.wp-review-1002590 .review-embed-code { padding: 7px 30px 15px; }
.wp-review-1002590 .review-embed-code #wp_review_embed_code { background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5) }
.wp-review-1002590 .wpr-rating-accept-btn {
background: #e57e34;
background: linear-gradient(to top, #e57e34, #f08436);
color: #000000;
margin: 10px 30px 12px;
width: -moz-calc(100% – 60px);
width: -webkit-calc(100% – 60px);
width: -o-calc(100% – 60px);
width: calc(100% – 60px);
border-radius: 50px;
}
@media screen and (max-width:600px) {
.wp-review-1002590.wp-review-point-type .review-list li .review-point,
.wp-review-1002590.wp-review-percentage-type .review-list li .review-percentage {
width: 40%;
}
.wp-review-1002590.wp-review-point-type .review-list li .wp-review-user-rating .review-point,
.wp-review-1002590.wp-review-percentage-type .review-list li .wp-review-user-rating .review-percentage {
width: 100%;
}
.wp-review-1002590.wp-review-point-type .wpr-user-features-rating .review-list li span,
.wp-review-1002590.wp-review-percentage-type .wpr-user-features-rating .review-list li span {
float: left;
line-height: 1.4;
font-size: 14px;
}
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .review-pros-cons .review-pros {
padding: 15px 30px;
}
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .review-pros-cons .review-cons {
padding: 15px 30px;
padding-top: 0;
}
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .user-total-wrapper {
max-width: 100%;
float: left;
}
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper.wp-review-circle-type .user-total-wrapper { max-width: 70%; }
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .user-total-wrapper h5,
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .user-total-wrapper .user-review-title { font-size: 14px; }
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .user-review-area .review-percentage,
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .user-review-area .review-point {
width: 50.5%;
}
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .review-links { padding: 15px 30px 5px; }
}
@media screen and (max-width: 480px) {
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .reviewed-item,
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .review-desc { padding: 15px; }
.wp-review-1002590 .review-list li,
.wp-review-1002590.wp-review-point-type .review-list li,
.wp-review-1002590.wp-review-percentage-type .review-list li,
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .wpr-user-features-rating .user-review-title,
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .user-review-area,
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .review-pros-cons .review-pros,
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .review-pros-cons .review-cons,
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .review-links,
.wp-review-1002590.review-wrapper .review-embed-code { padding: 12px 15px; }
}
]]>
Acting
Cinematography/Visual Effects
Plot/Screenplay
Setting/Theme
Watchability
Rewatchability
Summary: In her directorial debut Summer of 69, Jillian Bell aims to create a raunchy yet heartfelt comedy about growing up, sexual identity, and female friendship—but in trying to juggle all of its themes, tones, and character arcs, the film often loses its balance. A mix of mismatched comic sensibilities and surprisingly sincere moments, the film is elevated at times by its leads, especially Chloe Fineman and Sam Morelos, but ultimately suffers from tonal inconsistency and underbaked writing. Despite flashes of inspiration, it ends up feeling more like a sketch comedy idea stretched to feature length than a fully cohesive story.
2.5
Movie Fling
Publisher: Source link
‘Off Campus’ Teaser and Release Date Revealed by Prime Video
No one expected a love story between rival hockey players to become one of the most talked-about TV shows of 2025, but there's a lot more where Heated Rivalry came from, as a new teaser for Prime Video's foray into…
Mar 21, 2026
Sarah Michelle Gellar Urges ‘Buffy’ Fans to Avoid Reading Leaked Reboot Scripts
Buffy the Vampire Slayer fans have had a rough few days after Hulu officially pulled the plug on a revival of the series, which would have brought star Sarah Michelle Gellar back as the titular heroine. Described as a continuation…
Mar 20, 2026
Born Again’ Stars Explain Why Bullseye Is So Dangerous in Season 2 [Exclusive]
Along with Charlie Cox's Matt Murdock and Vincent D'Ofnorio's Wilson Fisk, Daredevil: Born Again Season 1 brought back one of The Man Without Fear's most notorious villains: Wilson Bethel's Benjamin Poindexter, better known as Bullseye. Not only was he back…
Mar 19, 2026
Born Again’ Showrunner Confirms ‘Avengers’ Character Is Key to Street Level MCU [Exclusive]
Ahead of the Avengers' return to the big screen later this year, Marvel Studios will return to street-level storytelling with the second season of Daredevil: Born Again on Disney+. Along with making the show canon to everything that happened in…
Mar 18, 2026







