post_page_cover

Steven DeKnight Calls Out “Old Disney Scam” To Avoid Contract Payments For “Daredevil: Born Again” Reboot

Sep 20, 2023

There is a lot of confusion surrounding Marvel Studios’ upcoming series, “Daredevil: Born Again.” Is it a continuation of the Netflix series? If not, why have the same actors in the roles? Marvel has been a bit vague on the details, but fans aren’t the only ones a bit frustrated by the lack of clarity regarding the idea behind ‘Born Again.’ Is it a reboot? Is it a revival? Well, according to the showrunner of Netflix’s “Daredevil” Season 1, this is all part of a plan by Disney to avoid having to pay the creators involved in the original series. 
READ MORE: ‘Daredevil: Born Again’: Clark Johnson To Have Recurring Role & Direct Two Episodes Of Upcoming Disney+ MCU Series
In a very lengthy series of posts on X/Twitter, writer-producerr Steven DeKnight talked about an “old Disney scam” being used with the new “Daredevil: Born Again,” which allows for the studio to avoid paying backend money to those involved with the Netflix series. While he’s very clear talking about how he isn’t mad at the people involved with ‘Born Again’—and he’s excited to watch the new series—DeKnight wants everyone to be aware of the legality surrounding a name change and how it abstains Disney from any obligation to pay those involved with the original series. 
“It’s an old Disney scam where they slightly rename a series to reset contract terms back to first season. Needs to be addressed by all the guilds/unions and crushed!” said DeKnight. “From what I understand, I’m not going to see a penny from ‘Daredevil: Born Again’ because they added the ‘Born Again’ and can claim it’s a completely different show. You know, with the exact same two lead actors (who I love!) playing Daredevil and Fisk.”
READ MORE: ‘Daredevil: Born Again’: Vincent D’Onofrio Teases Season 2 Of The Series & A “Really Deep, Really Emotional” Story
As mentioned, ‘Born Again’ brings back Charlie Cox and Vincent D’Onofrio to reprise their roles as Matt Murdock and Wilson Fisk, respectively, in a new story in the MCU. The original “Daredevil” series was released by Netflix and was never under the Marvel Studios banner, which led to confusion about whether or not it exists in the MCU. Now, there’s even more confusion as Marvel Studios brings back the stars for a new “reboot.”
Obviously, DeKnight would love to get an extra check in the mail, considering his hard work with creating “Daredevil” on Netflix and shepherding its first season is being used by Disney to launch this new iteration of the character on Disney+. However, he’s not beating this drum solely for his own benefit. He wants everyone to know this is part of a larger issue at Disney.
READ MORE: Marvel’s ‘Daredevil: Born Again’ Taps ‘American Assassin’ Director Michael Cuesta For Latest Disney+ Series
“It’s about shining a light on a company with a history of pulling this kind of thing to avoid certain contractual payments. Also if you’re starting from scratch, that means completely starting over from square one. New everything, including cast,” he added. “And more specifically, using this tactic for years to cheat the crews out of proper bumps in pay for their kids/young adult shows. That’s the main issue if you ask me.”
And DeKnight wants to make it clear that he’s perfectly happy with how Marvel Studios is relaunching the Daredevil character, as glimpsed in last year’s “She-Hulk.”
“I dug that!  Nice nod to his original yellow suit! And I LOVED him on ‘She-Hulk.’ Great stuff!” he said.
In a time when actors and writers are in open war with studios about contracts and the future of the business in terms of how people are compensated, it’s interesting to see even more issues come to light from folks involved. Perhaps someone like DeKnight using “Daredevil: Born Again” as an example will help showcase the practice allegedly used by Disney to avoid contractual obligations. It’s just another argument added to the list that shows just how important the current strikes are for SAG and WGA. 
He does. It’s an old Disney scam where they slightly rename a series to reset contract terms back to first season. Needs to be addressed by all the guilds/unions and crushed! https://t.co/Ttj4A3tnE4— Steven DeKnight (@stevendeknight) September 18, 2023

Disclaimer: This story is auto-aggregated by a computer program and has not been created or edited by filmibee.
Publisher: Source link

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
After 15 Years, James L. Brooks Returns With an Inane Family Drama

To say James L. Brooks is accomplished is a wild understatement. Starting in television, Brooks went from early work writing on My Mother the Car (when are we going to reboot that?) to creating The Mary Tyler Moore Show and…

Dec 17, 2025

Meditation on Greek Tragedy Explores Identity & Power In The 21st Century [NYFF]

A metatextual exploration of identity, race, privilege, communication, and betrayal, “Gavagai” is a small story with a massive scope. A movie about a movie which is itself an inversion of classic tropes and themes, the film exists on several levels…

Dec 17, 2025

The Running Man Review | Flickreel

Two of the Stephen King adaptations we’ve gotten this year have revolved around “games.” In The Long Walk, a group of young recruits must march forward until the last man is left standing. At least one person was inclined to…

Dec 15, 2025

Diane Kruger Faces a Mother’s Worst Nightmare in Paramount+’s Gripping Psychological Thriller

It's no easy feat being a mother — and the constant vigilance in anticipation of a baby's cry, the sleepless nights, and the continuous need to anticipate any potential harm before it happens can be exhausting. In Little Disasters, the…

Dec 15, 2025